Sabrina Harman, the specialist who took many of the
most shocking and infamous photos of prisoners at Abu Ghraib, is the subject of an important article in the March 24 edition of
The New Yorker.
The writers, journalist
Philip Gourevitch and documentary filmmaker
Errol Morris, investigate the circumstances that led Harman's unit, the 372
nd Military Policy Company from
Cresaptown, Maryland, to
torture the prisoners under their control and to document the mistreatment on their digital cameras.
Harman, as it happens, was
something of a softie. One of her fellow soldiers said she was "just too nice to be a soldier."
But the conditions at
Abu Ghraib were horrendous. Hanson said the place looked like a concentration camp. "It was
just disgusting. You didn't want to touch anything. Whatever the
worst thing that comes to your mind, that was it—the place you would never, ever, ever, ever, send your worst enemy."
Even so, Harman
learned to tolerate the conditions and accept the torture inflicted upon the prisoners. Prompted by a lack of guidelines as well as the Military Intelligence personnel who were questioning the prisoners, the Maryland
MPs were inspired to continue mistreating the men.
Although Harman and her fellow soldiers were blamed for the torture, the article makes clear that
they alone were not to blame. "[T]he abuse of prisoners at
Abu Ghraib was
de facto United States policy," they write.
Harman, who wanted to become a cop, took many of the photos that later embarrassed the military and the nation. But as
Gourevitch and Morris report, she was originally
motivated by a fascination with photography and a simple curiosity about death.
As the mistreatment continued, however, Harman started
using her camera to document the abuses, as a way of proving the mistreatment she was seeing.
In the end, Harman and several of
her follew
MPs were convicted for mistreating the prisoners. Only low-ranking soldiers were convicted, the authors note, and
no one has been charged for the abuses that were not photographed. There's more about the whole sad affair on
The New Yorker website, which can be found by
clicking here.